These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

262 related items for PubMed ID: 25667049

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhou H, Jin K, Zhang J, Wang W, Sun Y, Ruan C, Hu Z.
    Dig Surg; 2014; 31(4-5):384-91. PubMed ID: 25547093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Pain after single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Choi GJ, Kang H, Kim BG, Choi YS, Kim JY, Lee S.
    J Surg Res; 2017 May 15; 212():122-129. PubMed ID: 28550898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Deng L, Xiong J, Xia Q.
    J Evid Based Med; 2017 Aug 15; 10(3):196-206. PubMed ID: 28276643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus transumbilical and suprapubic single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using only conventional laparoscopic instruments.
    Wu S, Shen Y, Wang J, Wei J, Chen X.
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec 15; 407(8):3623-3629. PubMed ID: 36125515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cai YL, Xiong XZ, Wu SJ, Cheng Y, Lu J, Zhang J, Lin YX, Cheng NS.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug 21; 19(31):5165-73. PubMed ID: 23964153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis.
    Sozutek A, Colak T, Dirlik M, Ocal K, Turkmenoglu O, Dag A.
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Feb 21; 23(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 23386157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Extracorporeal and intracorporeal approaches of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: is one superior to another?
    Hsu YJ, Chang PC, Wei CH, Wei FY, Duh YC.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Nov 21; 52(11):1764-1768. PubMed ID: 28359589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review.
    Dasari BVM, Baker J, Markar S, Gardiner K.
    Int J Surg; 2015 Jan 21; 13():250-256. PubMed ID: 25498498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.