These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 2568775

  • 1. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
    Lovett I, Benn I, Benness G, Doust B.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Urography and renal clearance of contrast media. A randomized comparison of an ionic high-osmolar and a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium].
    Vestergaard AS, Thomsen HS.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jan 15; 152(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 2405555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
    Scherberich JE, Fischer A, Rautschka E, Kollath J, Riemann H.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jan 15; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Experimental urography in dogs: diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behavior of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media.
    Nauert C, Mützel W.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jan 15; 128():82-7. PubMed ID: 2568814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quality of urography and renal clearance of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Thomsen HS, Vestergaard A, Dorph S.
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan 15; 27(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1733879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cardiovascular responses following the intracarotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media compared with various mannitol solutions. Correlation with osmolality.
    Yamashita K, Hayakawa K, Tanaka M, Konishi J.
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep 15; 23(9):680-6. PubMed ID: 3141312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Osmolality of nonionic contrast media.
    Miklautz H, Fichte K, Wegscheider K.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Sep 15; 128():16-20. PubMed ID: 2568786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Iopamidol: new, nonionic contrast agent for excretory urography.
    Thompson WM, Foster WL, Halvorsen RA, Dunnick NR, Rommel AJ, Bates M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb 15; 142(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 6607602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Renal clearance of an ionic high-osmolar and a nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium.
    Thomsen HS, Vestergaard A, Nielsen SL, Fogh-Andersen N, Golman K, Dorph S.
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun 15; 26(6):564-8. PubMed ID: 1860763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Iopromide dosage and urographic image quality: is there an optimal dose?
    Dominik R, Keysser R, Taenzer V.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jun 15; 128():111-5. PubMed ID: 2568777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Hartwig P, Mützel W, Taenzer V.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jun 15; 128():220-3. PubMed ID: 2568800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Asymptomatic blood pressure and pulse rate changes during intravenous urography. Ionic contrast media vs. nonionic contrast media].
    Miwa K.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep 25; 50(9):1082-6. PubMed ID: 2247349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Quality control in urography using non-ionic contrast media (iopamidol) and induced hydration].
    Stacul F, Bazzocchi M, Zanella F, Abbona M.
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar 25; 72(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 3704214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Excretion of contrast media by the immature rabbit. Comparison of Renografin and Iopamidol.
    Rosenbaum DM, Caldicott WJ.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 Mar 25; 19(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6533102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H, Mayer R.
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug 15; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Urography with monomeric and dimeric nonionic contrast media: comparative, randomized, double-blind study of iotrolan 280 and iopromide 300.
    Taenzer V, Wenzel-Hora BI.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Aug 15; 128():116-8. PubMed ID: 2568778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.