These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

177 related items for PubMed ID: 25688839

  • 1. The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on performance and preference in students with autism.
    Bukala M, Hu MY, Lee R, Ward-Horner JC, Fienup DM.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 25688839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of reinforcer magnitude and distribution on preference for work schedules.
    Ward-Horner JC, Pittenger A, Pace G, Fienup DM.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):623-7. PubMed ID: 24825241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. How should periods without social interaction be scheduled? Children's preference for practical schedules of positive reinforcement.
    Luczynski KC, Hanley GP.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):500-22. PubMed ID: 24890928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
    Geckeler AS, Libby ME, Graff RB, Ahearn WH.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.
    Ito M, Nakamura K.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 9465415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior.
    DeLeon IG, Neidert PL, Anders BM, Rodriguez-Catter V.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001 Jan; 34(4):521-5. PubMed ID: 11800194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Student preference for and performance in fixed- versus mixed-duration schedules.
    Mellott JA, Ardoin SP.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2023 Apr; 56(2):458-469. PubMed ID: 36912472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessing preferences for positive and negative reinforcement during treatment of destructive behavior with functional communication training.
    Fisher WW, Adelinis JD, Volkert VM, Keeney KM, Neidert PL, Hovanetz A.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005 Apr; 26(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15590246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.