These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 25690687

  • 1. The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces.
    Oliveira G, Macedo PD, Tsurumaki JN, Sampaio JE, Marcantonio R.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 25690687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, Ito K.
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study.
    Maritato M, Orazi L, Laurito D, Formisano G, Serra E, Lollobrigida M, Molinari A, De Biase A.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of instrumentation using curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the morphology and adhesion of blood components on root surfaces: a SEM study.
    Tsurumaki Jdo N, Souto BH, Oliveira GJ, Sampaio JE, Marcantonio Júnior E, Marcantonio RA.
    Braz Dent J; 2011 Nov; 22(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 21915514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study.
    Arabaci T, Cicek Y, Dilsiz A, Erdogan İY, Kose O, Kizildağ A.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23033943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An in vitro comparative study of a reciprocating scaler for root surface debridement.
    Lee A, Heasman PA, Kelly PJ.
    J Dent; 1996 Feb; 24(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 8636498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C, Santos A, Nart J, Levi P, Velásquez A, Sanz Moliner J.
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A microscopic analysis of the effects of root surface scaling with different power parameters of Er,Cr:YSGG laser.
    de Oliveira GJ, Cominotte MA, Beraldo TP, Sampaio JE, Marcantonio RA.
    Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Jun; 78(6):529-35. PubMed ID: 25951453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of a new ultrasonic scaler on fibroblast attachment to root surfaces: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
    Kishida M, Sato S, Ito K.
    J Periodontal Res; 2004 Apr; 39(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15009519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using manual, ultrasonic and rotary instruments: an in vitro study using scanning electron microscopy.
    Marda P, Prakash S, Devaraj CG, Vastardis S.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Apr; 23(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 22945704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
    Kocher T, Langenbeck M, Rühling A, Plagmann HC.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E, Dominici F, Gokbuget AY, Cintan S, Guida L, Aydin MS, Mariotti A, Pilloni A.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
    Silva D, Martins O, Matos S, Lopes P, Rolo T, Baptista I.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Root surface smoothness or roughness following open debridement. An in vivo study.
    Schlageter L, Rateitschak-Plüss EM, Schwarz JP.
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):460-4. PubMed ID: 8783052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of a new magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler and a traditional piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler on root surfaces and patient complaints.
    You X, Wu X, Chen S.
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar 19; 14(1):6601. PubMed ID: 38503814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.