These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


394 related items for PubMed ID: 25698005

  • 1. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG, Iyer N, Brungart DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
    Wess JM, Brungart DS, Bernstein JGW.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Feb; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
    Freyman RL, Balakrishnan U, Helfer KS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.
    Gibbs BE, Bernstein JGW, Brungart DS, Goupell MJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):1230. PubMed ID: 36050186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.
    Bernstein JGW, Stakhovskaya OA, Jensen KK, Goupell MJ.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Aug; 41(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 31584504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
    Brungart DS, Iyer N.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.
    Fogerty D, Xu J, Gibbs BE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1800. PubMed ID: 27914381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J, Mason CR, Streeter TM, Best V, Roverud E, Kidd G.
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug 03; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr 03; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.
    Müller V, Lang-Roth R.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug 09; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA, Freyman RL.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug 09; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Aug 09; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Simulations of cochlear-implant speech perception in modulated and unmodulated noise.
    Ihlefeld A, Deeks JM, Axon PR, Carlyon RP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug 09; 128(2):870-80. PubMed ID: 20707456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.
    Freyman RL, Griffin AM, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct 09; 132(4):2514-23. PubMed ID: 23039445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
    Chen J, Shi Y, Kong Y, Chen B, Zhang L, Galvin JJ, Li Y, Fu QJ.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct 09; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC, Arehart KH, Kates JM.
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar 09; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar 09; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr 09; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.