These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study. den Besten CA, Monksfield P, Bosman A, Skarzynski PH, Green K, Runge C, Wigren S, Blechert JI, Flynn MC, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Bonebridge in Adults with Mixed and Conductive Hearing Loss: Audiological and Quality of Life Outcomes. Skarżyński PH, Ratuszniak A, Król B, Kozieł M, Osińska K, Cywka KB, Sztabnicka A, Skarżyński H. Audiol Neurootol; 2019 Mar; 24(2):90-99. PubMed ID: 31141814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features. Curca IA, Parsa V, Macpherson EA, Scollie S, Vansevenant K, Zimmerman K, Lewis-Teeter J, Allen P, Parnes L, Agrawal S. Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):556-565. PubMed ID: 32069128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Ihler F, Volbers L, Blum J, Matthias C, Canis M. Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant. Alzhrani F. Saudi Med J; 2019 Aug; 40(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 31423516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss. Barbara M, Perotti M, Gioia B, Volpini L, Monini S. Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 133(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 23768011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing. Desmet JB, Bosman AJ, Snik AF, Lambrechts P, Hol MK, Mylanus EA, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P. Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss. Pfiffner F, Caversaccio MD, Kompis M. Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term follow-up and review of the Bone Conduction Implant. Reinfeldt S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Fredén Jansson KJ, Persson AC, Håkansson B. Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 421():108503. PubMed ID: 35490057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Audiometric Comparison Between the First Patients With the Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant and Matched Percutaneous Bone Anchored Hearing Device Users. Rigato C, Reinfeldt S, Håkansson B, Jansson KJ, Hol MK, Eeg-Olofsson M. Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1381-7. PubMed ID: 27631828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Does hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation involve skull vibrations? A within-subject comparison between skull vibration magnitudes and hearing thresholds. Chordekar S, Perez R, Adelman C, Sohmer H, Kishon-Rabin L. Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():59-67. PubMed ID: 29678325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can audiometric results predict qualitative hearing improvements in bone-anchored hearing aid recipients? McNeil ML, Gulliver M, Morris DP, Makki FM, Bance M. J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Jan; 128(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24330750 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss. Park MJ, Lee JR, Yang CJ, Yoo MH, Jin IS, Choi CH, Park HJ. Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]