These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
303 related items for PubMed ID: 25706137
1. Variation in the calibrated response of LiF, Al2O3, and silicon dosimeters when used for in-phantom measurements of source photons with energies between 30 KeV AND 300 KeV. Poudel S, Currier B, Medich DC. Health Phys; 2015 Apr; 108(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 25706137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV). Tedgren AC, Hedman A, Grindborg JE, Carlsson GA. Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dependence of Yb-169 absorbed dose energy correction factors on self-attenuation in source material and photon buildup in water. Medich DC, Munro JJ. Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2135-44. PubMed ID: 20527547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical note: Influence of the phantom material on the absorbed-dose energy dependence of the EBT3 radiochromic film for photons in the energy range 3 keV-18 MeV. Hermida-López M, Lüdemann L, Flühs A, Brualla L. Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112103. PubMed ID: 25370654 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-energy photons in high-energy photon fields--Monte Carlo generated spectra and a new descriptive parameter. Chofor N, Harder D, Willborn K, Rühmann A, Poppe B. Z Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 21(3):183-97. PubMed ID: 21530198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Energy dependence of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter for HDR 192 Ir brachytherapy source. Hashimoto S, Nakajima Y, Kadoya N, Abe K, Karasawa K. Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):964-972. PubMed ID: 30506576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response. Carlsson Tedgren A, Elia R, Hedtjarn H, Olsson S, Alm Carlsson G. Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the energy-response factor of LiF and Al2O3 in radiotherapy beams. Mobit P, Agyingi E, Sandison G. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006 Feb; 119(1-4):497-9. PubMed ID: 16735558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Water equivalent phantom materials for ¹⁹²Ir brachytherapy. Schoenfeld AA, Harder D, Poppe B, Chofor N. Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec 21; 60(24):9403-20. PubMed ID: 26579946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source. Lucas PA, Aubineau-Lanièce I, Lourenço V, Vermesse D, Cutarella D. Med Phys; 2014 Jan 21; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction factors for source strength determination in HDR brachytherapy using the in-phantom method. Ubrich F, Wulff J, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Zink K. Z Med Phys; 2014 May 21; 24(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 24021956 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On the feasibility of polyurethane based 3D dosimeters with optical CT for dosimetric verification of low energy photon brachytherapy seeds. Adamson J, Yang Y, Juang T, Chisholm K, Rankine L, Adamovics J, Yin FF, Oldham M. Med Phys; 2014 Jul 21; 41(7):071705. PubMed ID: 24989374 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Track-average LET of secondary electrons generated in LiF:Mg,Ti and liquid water by 20-300 kV x-ray, 137Cs and 60Co beams. Cabrera-Santiago A, Massillon-Jl G. Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov 21; 61(22):7919-7933. PubMed ID: 27779122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo evaluations of the absorbed dose and quality dependence of AL2O3 in radiotherapy photon beams. Chen SW, Wang XT, Chen LX, Tang Q, Liu XW. Med Phys; 2009 Oct 21; 36(10):4421-4. PubMed ID: 19928072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In-phantom response of LiF TLD-100 for dosimetry of 192Ir HDR source. Pradhan AS, Quast U. Med Phys; 2000 May 21; 27(5):1025-9. PubMed ID: 10841406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation into the accuracy of Acuros(TM) BV in heterogeneous phantoms for a (192)Ir HDR source using LiF TLDs. Manning S, Nyathi T. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Sep 21; 37(3):505-14. PubMed ID: 24866931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation of voxel geometries for MCNP-based radiation dose calculations. Zhang J, Bednarz B, Xu XG. Health Phys; 2006 Nov 21; 91(5 Suppl):S59-65. PubMed ID: 17023800 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV. Kim JL, Lee JI, Ji YH, Kim BH, Kim JS, Chang SY. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006 Nov 21; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A Monte Carlo-based dosimetric characterization of Esteya® , an electronic surface brachytherapy unit. Valdes-Cortez C, Niatsetski Y, Perez-Calatayud J, Ballester F, Vijande J. Med Phys; 2019 Jan 21; 46(1):356-369. PubMed ID: 30390317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]