These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

257 related items for PubMed ID: 25716577

  • 41. Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: the state of the law and the science.
    Penrod SD, Fulero SM, Cutler BL.
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):229-59. PubMed ID: 10150378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. The admissibility of behavioral science evidence in the courtroom: the translation of legal to scientific concepts and back.
    Faust D, Grimm PW, Ahern DC, Sokolik M.
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2010; 6():49-77. PubMed ID: 17716029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. The expert witness. Neither Frye nor Daubert solved the problem: what can be done?
    Kaufman HH.
    Sci Justice; 2001; 41(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 11215302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. The admissibility of offender profiling in courtroom: a review of legal issues and court opinions.
    Bosco D, Zappalà A, Santtila P.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 20416950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
    Levett LM, Kovera MB.
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Industrial/organizational psychology and the federal judiciary: expert witness testimony and the Daubert standards.
    Wingate PH, Thornton GC.
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Feb; 28(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 15055343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Forensic human identification in the United States and Canada: a review of the law, admissible techniques, and the legal implications of their application in forensic cases.
    Holobinko A.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct 10; 222(1-3):394.e1-13. PubMed ID: 22738737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Daubert and the proper role for the courts in health, safety, and environmental regulation.
    McGarity TO.
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Oct 10; 95 Suppl 1():S92-8. PubMed ID: 16030345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Expert testimony, legal reasoning, and justice. The case for adopting a data-based standard of care in allegations of medical negligence in the NICU.
    Meadow W, Lantos JD.
    Clin Perinatol; 1996 Sep 10; 23(3):583-95. PubMed ID: 8884129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Science and the law: scientific evidence, causation, admissibility, reliability "Daubert" decision revisited.
    Brautbar N.
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1999 Oct 10; 15(6):532-51. PubMed ID: 10560132
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence.
    Marlowe DB.
    Behav Sci Law; 1995 Oct 10; 13(2):207-28. PubMed ID: 10150377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. A cognitive scientist looks at Daubert.
    Lakoff GP.
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Oct 10; 95 Suppl 1():S114-20. PubMed ID: 16030326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.