These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
164 related items for PubMed ID: 25724574
1. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models. Reuschl RP, Heuer W, Stiesch M, Wenzel D, Dittmer MP. Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 25724574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO. Braz Oral Res; 2009 Feb; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19893964 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning. Gül Amuk N, Karsli E, Kurt G. Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases. Im J, Cha JY, Lee KJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity. Czarnota J, Hey J, Fuhrmann R. J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U, Wong RW, Bendeus M, Yeung S. Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity. Liang YM, Rutchakitprakarn L, Kuang SH, Wu TY. J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast. Al-Mashraqi AA, Alhammadi MS, Gadi AA, Altharawi RA, Zamim KAH, Halboub E. Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec 21; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Feb 21; 14(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21205164 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Validity and reliability of digital diagnostic measurements on digital three-dimensional dental models]. Wiranto MG, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Engelbrecht WP, Ren Y. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2012 Feb 21; 119(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 22428274 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements. Nouri M, Massudi R, Bagheban AA, Azimi S, Fereidooni F. Aust Orthod J; 2009 May 21; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]