These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dejak B, Młotkowski A. Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling. Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Fabianelli A, Gloria A, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Watts DC. Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Mandibular Molar Tooth Restored by Different Indirect Restorations Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method. Çelik Köycü B, İmirzalıoğlu P. J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):460-473. PubMed ID: 26618930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. May LG, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T. Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):e99-109. PubMed ID: 22595741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations--a 3D finite element analysis. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Dent Mater; 2002 Jun; 18(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 11992906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, Watts DC. Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Contraction stresses in direct and indirect composite restorations compared by crack analysis. Yamamoto T, Nakamura Y, Nishide A, Kubota Y, Momoi Y. J Adhes Dent; 2013 Feb; 15(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 23534000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations? Novaes JB, Talma E, Las Casas EB, Aregawi W, Kolstad LW, Mantell S, Wang Y, Fok A. Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An acoustic emission study on interfacial debonding in composite restorations. Liu X, Li H, Li J, Lu P, Fok AS. Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):934-41. PubMed ID: 21700327 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of customized composite resin fibreglass posts on the mechanics of restored treated teeth. Anchieta RB, Rocha EP, Almeida EO, Freitas AC, Martin M, Martini AP, Archangelo CM, Ko CC. Int Endod J; 2012 Feb; 45(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 22070803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations. Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Garcia-Godoy F, Gloria A, Lanzotti A, Maietta S, Martorelli M. Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro exploration and finite element analysis of failure mechanisms of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. van Dalen A, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 18761569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]