These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

290 related items for PubMed ID: 25728108

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Finite element analysis of bonded model Class I 'restorations' after shrinkage.
    Rodrigues FP, Silikas N, Watts DC, Ballester RY.
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 22036589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Microhardness of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns.
    Gregor L, Bouillaguet S, Onisor I, Ardu S, Krejci I, Rocca GT.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):942-8. PubMed ID: 24767899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello PP, Ciaramella S, Lanzotti A, Ventre M, Borges AL, Tribst JP, Dal Piva A, Garcia-Godoy F.
    Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Multi-factorial analysis of a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration: A finite element study.
    Lin CL, Chang YH, Liu PR.
    J Dent; 2008 Mar; 36(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 18221831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Stress analysis of two methods of ceramic inlay preparation by finite element.
    Pishevar L, Ghavam M, Pishevar A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014 Mar; 25(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 25098996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Impairment of resin cement application on the bond strength of indirect composite restorations.
    Skupien JA, Porto JA, Münchow EA, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T.
    Braz Oral Res; 2015 Mar; 29():. PubMed ID: 26039908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effect of preparation design on fracture strength of compromised molars restored with direct composite resin restorations: An in vitro and finite element analysis study.
    Hofsteenge JW, Carvalho MA, Botenga ELF, Cune MS, Özcan M, Magne P, Gresnigt MMM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1150-1158. PubMed ID: 38670907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of luting materials, presence of tooth preparation, and functional loading on stress distribution on ceramic laminate veneers: A finite element analysis.
    Bragança GF, Mazão JD, Versluis A, Soares CJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):778-787. PubMed ID: 32423551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
    Vasudeva G, Bogra P, Nikhil V, Singh V.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Jun; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Cementation of indirect restorations: an overview of resin cements.
    Stamatacos C, Simon JF.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Jan; 34(1):42-4, 46. PubMed ID: 23550330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration.
    Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 15134943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A three-dimensional finite element model of the polymerization process in dental restorations.
    Barink M, Van der Mark PC, Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N.
    Biomaterials; 2003 Apr; 24(8):1427-35. PubMed ID: 12527284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Gomide HA, Araujo CA, Martins LR, Soares CJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Combining structural-thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration.
    Lin CL, Chang YH, Lin YF.
    J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):626-36. PubMed ID: 18550252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.