These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

403 related items for PubMed ID: 25732724

  • 1. The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention.
    Koelewijn T, de Kluiver H, Shinn-Cunningham BG, Zekveld AA, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():81-90. PubMed ID: 25732724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Wendt D, Naylor G, Wang Y, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D, Koelewijn T, Książek P, Kramer SE, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Nov; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K, McMahon C, Boisvert I, Ibrahim R, de Lissa P, Graham P, Lyxell B.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Sep; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Sep; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1596-606. PubMed ID: 24606294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE.
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Mar; 51(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 24506437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
    Koelewijn T, van Haastrecht JAP, Kramer SE.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Mar; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Rönnberg J, Rudner M.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Mar; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.
    Zhang Y, Lehmann A, Deroche M.
    PLoS One; 2021 Mar; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA, Heslenfeld DJ, Johnsrude IS, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov 01; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The pupil response is sensitive to divided attention during speech processing.
    Koelewijn T, Shinn-Cunningham BG, Zekveld AA, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun 01; 312():114-20. PubMed ID: 24709275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.
    McCloy DR, Lau BK, Larson E, Pratt KAI, Lee AKC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr 01; 141(4):2440. PubMed ID: 28464660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.