These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1030 related items for PubMed ID: 25751695
1. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels. Kuk F, Lau CC, Korhonen P, Crose B. J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Subjective Speech Intelligibility Drives Noise-Tolerance Domain Use During the Tracking of Noise-Tolerance Test. Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P. Ear Hear; 2015 Mar; 45(6):1484-1495. PubMed ID: 38880961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS. Shanks JE, Wilson RH, Larson V, Williams D. Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S. Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit. Kuk F, Seper E, Lau CC, Korhonen P. J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of linear frequency transposition on consonant identification in quiet and in noise. Kuk F, Keenan D, Korhonen P, Lau CC. J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):465-79. PubMed ID: 19764167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening. Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR. Ear Hear; 2014 Sep; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Predict Hearing Aid Satisfaction in Loud Noisy Environments. Seper E, Kuk F, Korhonen P, Slugocki C. J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Apr; 30(4):302-314. PubMed ID: 30461409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance. Oeding K, Valente M. J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners. Grant KW, Walden TC. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Völker C, Warzybok A, Ernst SM. Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing. Bernstein JG, Summers V, Grassi E, Grant KW. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr 30; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS. Ear Hear; 2006 Oct 30; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring Objective and Subjective Intelligibility Using Speech Materials from the Tracking of Noise Tolerance (TNT) Test. Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P. J Am Acad Audiol; 2024 Oct 29. PubMed ID: 37595620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. Stone MA, Moore BC, Alcántara JI, Glasberg BR. J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec 29; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss. Seeto A, Searchfield GD. J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar 29; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners. Woods DL, Arbogast T, Doss Z, Younus M, Herron TJ, Yund EW. PLoS One; 2015 Mar 29; 10(3):e0114922. PubMed ID: 25730423 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli. Carter L, Dillon H, Seymour J, Seeto M, Van Dun B. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct 29; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers. Narendran MM, Humes LE. Ear Hear; 2003 Feb 29; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. Bernstein JG, Mehraei G, Shamma S, Gallun FJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr 29; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]