These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 25753019

  • 1. A multicenter study on the performance of a fully automated, walk-away high-throughput analyzer for pretransfusion testing in the US population.
    Roback JD, Barclay S, Moulds JM, Denomme GA.
    Transfusion; 2015 Jun; 55(6 Pt 2):1522-8. PubMed ID: 25753019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of Erytra® fully automated analyser for Routine Use in Transfusion Laboratory.
    Chang C, Brown M, Davies L, Pointon L, Brown R, Barker D.
    Transfus Med; 2014 Feb; 24(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 24188135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance and reliability of a benchtop automated instrument for transfusion testing: a comparative multicenter clinical study in the US population.
    Roback JD, Denomme GA, Billingsley K, Bensing K, Parsons JC, McDonough WC.
    Transfusion; 2019 Nov; 59(11):3511-3518. PubMed ID: 31532543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Multicentre evaluation of Erytra Eflexis®, a benchtop fully automated analyser with a compact design for routine use in blood transfusion laboratory.
    Elliott C, Carrascosa T, Souchet JL, Smith D, Malaxetxebarria I, You J, Bendahan M, Barnes S, Lisle F, Whitehouse N.
    Transfus Med; 2019 Dec; 29(6):401-407. PubMed ID: 31321832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of two automated instruments for pre-transfusion testing: AutoVue Innova and Techno TwinStation.
    Shin SY, Kwon KC, Koo SH, Park JW, Ko CS, Song JH, Sung JY.
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 28(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 18594174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of an automated microplate technique in the Galileo system for ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping.
    Xu W, Wan F, Lou Y, Jin J, Mao W.
    Clin Lab; 2014 Jun; 60(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 24660536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validation of a hospital-laboratory workstation for immunohematologic methods.
    Schoenfeld H, Pretzel KJ, von Heymann C, Neuner B, Kalus U, Kiesewetter H, Pruss A.
    Transfusion; 2010 Jan; 50(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19709392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. North American pretransfusion testing practices, 2001-2004: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program survey data, 2001-2004.
    Shulman IA, Maffei LM, Downes KA.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 16048410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Optimal blood grouping and antibody screening for safe transfusion.
    Makarovska-Bojadzieva T, Blagoevska M, Kolevski P, Kostovska S.
    Prilozi; 2009 Jul; 30(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 19736535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Automated blood grouping by gel technology.
    Parker PI, Scott Y, McArdle B, Wallis JP.
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1995 Dec; 52(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 8555780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Guidelines for microplate techniques in liquid-phase blood grouping and antibody screening. A Joint Publication of the British Society for Haematology and the British Blood Transfusion Society. BCSH Blood Transfusion Task Force.
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1990 Dec; 12(4):437-60. PubMed ID: 2127909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A microplate system for ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping.
    Chung A, Birch P, Ilagan K.
    Transfusion; 1993 May; 33(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 8110210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Group Serology. ABO and D grouping, antibody screening, direct antiglobulin test and antibody identification 1984-1985.
    Holburn AM, Prior DM, Whitton CM.
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1988 May; 10(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 3130215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Weak D phenotypes and transfusion safety: where do we stand in daily practice?
    Noizat-Pirenne F, Verdier M, Lejealle A, Mercadier A, Bonin P, Peltier-Pujol F, Fialaire-Legendre A, Tournamille C, Bierling P, Ansart-Pirenne H.
    Transfusion; 2007 Sep; 47(9):1616-20. PubMed ID: 17725725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Exponential error reduction in pretransfusion testing with automation.
    South SF, Casina TS, Li L.
    Transfusion; 2012 Aug; 52(8):81S-87S. PubMed ID: 22882101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of three low-ionic-strength solutions for routine pretransfusion testing: antibody screening/identification, cross-matching, immune anti-ABO detection, and direct antiglobulin tests.
    Kaspi E, Mallié F, Gouvitsos J, Dettori I, Chiaroni J, Ferrera V.
    Transfusion; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2772-3. PubMed ID: 20163691
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Erythrocyte-magnetized technology: an original and innovative method for blood group serology.
    Bouix O, Ferrera V, Delamaire M, Redersdorff JC, Roubinet F.
    Transfusion; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1878-85. PubMed ID: 18522706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. ABO blood group discrepancies among blood donors in Regional Blood Transfusion Centre GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
    Sharma T, Garg N, Singh B.
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Feb; 50(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 24314713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reactivity of FDA-approved anti-D reagents with partial D red blood cells.
    Judd WJ, Moulds M, Schlanser G.
    Immunohematology; 2005 Feb; 21(4):146-8. PubMed ID: 16472014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Identifying D-positive donors using a second automated testing platform.
    Goldman M, Resz I, Cote J, Ochoa G, Angus N.
    Immunohematology; 2013 Feb; 29(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 24325169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.