These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

183 related items for PubMed ID: 25754944

  • 1. Comparing the efficacy and safety between robotic-assisted versus open pyeloplasty in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    Chang SJ, Hsu CK, Hsieh CH, Yang SS.
    World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1855-65. PubMed ID: 25754944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.
    Esposito C, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, Sforza S, Farina A, Cerulo M, Cini C, Del Conte F, Escolino M.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
    Braga LH, Pace K, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ.
    Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 19359084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.
    Varda BK, Wang Y, Chung BI, Lee RS, Kurtz MP, Nelson CP, Chang SL.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):336.e1-336.e8. PubMed ID: 29530407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Abdel-Karim AM, Fahmy A, Moussa A, Rashad H, Elbadry M, Badawy H, Hammady A.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?
    Kafka IZ, Kocherov S, Jaber J, Chertin B.
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2019 Mar; 35(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 30643964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Chandrasekharam VVS, Babu R.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Oct; 18(5):642-649. PubMed ID: 36117037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, Guazzoni G, Buffi N, Peters CA, Stein RJ, Gettman M.
    Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):430-52. PubMed ID: 23856037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of Robotic Pyeloplasty and Standard Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants: A Bi-Institutional Study.
    Neheman A, Kord E, Zisman A, Darawsha AE, Noh PH.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Apr; 28(4):467-470. PubMed ID: 29206567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang F, Xu Y, Zhong H.
    Scand J Urol; 2013 Aug; 47(4):251-64. PubMed ID: 23514570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children less than 20 kg by weight: single-center experience.
    Ganpule A, Jairath A, Singh A, Mishra S, Sabnis R, Desai M.
    World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1867-73. PubMed ID: 26433387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success.
    Andolfi C, Rodríguez VM, Galansky L, Gundeti MS.
    Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 34247895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.