These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

268 related items for PubMed ID: 25785242

  • 1. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Whang P, Cher D, Polly D, Frank C, Lockstadt H, Glaser J, Limoni R, Sembrano J.
    Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():6. PubMed ID: 25785242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.
    Polly DW, Cher DJ, Wine KD, Whang PG, Frank CJ, Harvey CF, Lockstadt H, Glaser JA, Limoni RP, Sembrano JN, INSITE Study Group.
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Nov; 77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. PubMed ID: 26291338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.
    Polly DW, Swofford J, Whang PG, Frank CJ, Glaser JA, Limoni RP, Cher DJ, Wine KD, Sembrano JN, INSITE Study Group.
    Int J Spine Surg; 2016 Nov; 10():28. PubMed ID: 27652199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.
    Duhon BS, Bitan F, Lockstadt H, Kovalsky D, Cher D, Hillen T, SIFI Study Group.
    Int J Spine Surg; 2016 Nov; 10():13. PubMed ID: 27162715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Long-term prospective outcomes after minimally invasive trans-iliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants.
    Darr E, Meyer SC, Whang PG, Kovalsky D, Frank C, Lockstadt H, Limoni R, Redmond A, Ploska P, Oh MY, Cher D, Chowdhary A.
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2018 Nov; 11():113-121. PubMed ID: 29674852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.
    Dengler JD, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, Gasbarrini A, Prestamburgo D, Gaetani P, van Eeckhoven E, Cher D, Sturesson B.
    Pain Physician; 2017 Sep; 20(6):537-550. PubMed ID: 28934785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion in women with persistent post-partum posterior pelvic girdle pain: 12-month outcomes from a prospective, multi-center trial.
    Capobianco R, Cher D, SIFI Study Group.
    Springerplus; 2015 Sep; 4():570. PubMed ID: 26543705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.
    Rainov NG, Schneiderhan R, Heidecke V.
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Apr; 28(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 30564865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium versus Cylindrical Threaded Implants: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes.
    Claus CF, Lytle E, Kaufmann A, Tong D, Bahoura M, Garmo L, Richards B, Soo TM, Houseman C.
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e745-e750. PubMed ID: 31605853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?
    Copay AG, Cher DJ.
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Feb; 25(2):283-292. PubMed ID: 26245709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ghaddaf AA, Alsharef JF, Alsharef NK, Alsaegh MH, Alshaban RM, Almutairi AO, Abualola AH, Alshehri MS.
    Can J Surg; 2024 Feb; 67(1):E16-E26. PubMed ID: 38278549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants.
    Rudolf L, Capobianco R.
    Open Orthop J; 2014 Feb; 8():375-83. PubMed ID: 25352932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Lateral Approach Using Triangular Titanium Implants and Navigation.
    Polly DW, Holton KJ.
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2020 Feb; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 33204578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Catamaran SI Joint Fusion System(R) MAINSAILTM Study: a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, post-market study of six-month clinical outcomes and twelve-month radiographic findings.
    Davies M, Dreischarf M, Yusufbekov R.
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2024 Sep; 21(9):851-858. PubMed ID: 39161110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.
    Dat KO, Cher D, Polly DW.
    Spine J; 2024 May; 24(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 38081463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.