These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

523 related items for PubMed ID: 25786954

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS, Rogers CL, Cardenas ES, Russell BA, Hanna NH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
    Peng SC, Chatterjee M, Lu N.
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of spectral resolution on spectral contrast effects in cochlear-implant users.
    Feng L, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL468. PubMed ID: 29960500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.
    Winn MB, Chatterjee M, Idsardi WJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb 13; 131(2):1465-79. PubMed ID: 22352517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.
    Whitmal NA, DeMaio D, Lin R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb 13; 137(2):733-44. PubMed ID: 25698008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O, Pentony S, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar 13; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY, Winn MB, Poellmann K, Donaldson GS.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun 17; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
    Jones H, Kan A, Litovsky RY.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov 10; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB, Moore AN.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Nov 10; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y, Escabí M, Litovsky RY.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug 10; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.
    Hedrick M, Bahng J, von Hapsburg D, Younger MS.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug 10; 50(8):540-7. PubMed ID: 21604957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
    Bhargava P, Gaudrain E, Başkent D.
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar 10; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug 10; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug 10; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.