These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


760 related items for PubMed ID: 25795349

  • 1. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
    Uloza V, Padervinskis E, Uloziene I, Saferis V, Verikas A.
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening.
    Uloza V, Padervinskis E, Vegiene A, Pribuisiene R, Saferis V, Vaiciukynas E, Gelzinis A, Verikas A.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3391-9. PubMed ID: 26162450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
    Oliveira G, Fava G, Baglione M, Pimpinella M.
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Effect of Microphone Type on Acoustical Measures of Synthesized Vowels.
    Kisenwether JS, Sataloff RT.
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 25998411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.
    Bottalico P, Codino J, Cantor-Cutiva LC, Marks K, Nudelman CJ, Skeffington J, Shrivastav R, Jackson-Menaldi MC, Hunter EJ, Rubin AD.
    J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):320-334. PubMed ID: 30471944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S, Melo Pestana P, Almeida V, Ferreira A.
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.
    Manfredi C, Lebacq J, Cantarella G, Schoentgen J, Orlandi S, Bandini A, DeJonckere PH.
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
    Brockmann M, Drinnan MJ, Storck C, Carding PN.
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.
    Mohseni R, Sandoughdar N.
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses.
    Lopes LW, Batista Simões L, Delfino da Silva J, da Silva Evangelista D, da Nóbrega E Ugulino AC, Oliveira Costa Silva P, Jefferson Dias Vieira V.
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):382.e15-382.e26. PubMed ID: 27742492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
    Maryn Y, Ysenbaert F, Zarowski A, Vanspauwen R.
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An Innovative Voice Analyzer "VA" Smart Phone Program for Quantitative Analysis of Voice Quality.
    Kojima T, Fujimura S, Hori R, Okanoue Y, Shoji K, Inoue M.
    J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 29801970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Objective multi-parameters analysis of the voice dysphonia].
    Yu P, Wang G, Han B, Yang W, Han D.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 18(12):751-4. PubMed ID: 15831052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW, Barbosa Lima IL, Alves Almeida LN, Cavalcante DP, de Almeida AA.
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S, Madill C, McCabe P, Heard R, Yiu E.
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Relationship Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-evaluation in Patients With Voice Disorders.
    Lopes LW, da Silva JD, Simões LB, Evangelista DDS, Silva POC, Almeida AA, de Lima-Silva MFB.
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119.e1-119.e10. PubMed ID: 27049448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S, Lowit A.
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Correlation Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-Reported Voice Disorders Among Female Teachers.
    Lin FC, Chen SH, Chen SC, Wang CT, Kuo YC.
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 26096986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
    Franca MC.
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
    Lebacq J, Schoentgen J, Cantarella G, Bruss FT, Manfredi C, DeJonckere P.
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 38.