These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

312 related items for PubMed ID: 25796804

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M, Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Özcan M, Hämmerle CH, Benic GI.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow.
    Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1759-64. PubMed ID: 23086333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A.
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry IL, Thomas GW, Qian F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S, Salido MP, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Pradíes G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC, Chaves SB, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, Weigl P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.