These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


275 related items for PubMed ID: 25811560

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Thoma A, Veltri K, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, Duku E.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 May; 113(6):1650-61. PubMed ID: 15114125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
    Wan DC, Tseng CY, Anderson-Dam J, Dalio AL, Crisera CA, Festekjian JH.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
    Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K, Papsdorf M, Lennox PA, Hazen A, Matros E, Disa J, Mehrara B, Pusic AL.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps.
    Chen CM, Halvorson EG, Disa JJ, McCarthy C, Hu QY, Pusic AL, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Nov; 120(6):1477-1482. PubMed ID: 18040176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A Comparison between DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps in breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's recent experience.
    Nelson JA, Guo Y, Sonnad SS, Low DW, Kovach SJ, Wu LC, Serletti JM.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Nov; 126(5):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 21042098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Rezoning Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flaps Based on Perforasome Groupings and a New Understanding of the Vascular Architecture of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery-Based Flaps.
    Tan J, Ohjimi H, Takagi S, Kawakami Y, Eto A.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Dec; 83(6):e59-e67. PubMed ID: 31232810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A systematic review of abdominal wall function following abdominal flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Atisha D, Alderman AK.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Aug; 63(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 19593108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Using propensity score analysis to compare major complications between DIEP and free muscle-sparing TRAM flap breast reconstructions.
    Zhong T, Novak CB, Bagher S, Maass SWMC, Zhang J, Arad U, O'Neill AC, Metcalfe KA, Hofer SOP.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):774-782. PubMed ID: 24675183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.