These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
538 related items for PubMed ID: 25825096
1. Effectiveness of an infiltrant on sealing of composite restoration margins with/without artificial caries. Tulunoglu O, Tulunoglu IF, Antonson SA, Campillo-Funollet M, Antonson D, Munoz-Viveros C. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov 01; 15(6):717-25. PubMed ID: 25825096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S. Oper Dent; 2011 Nov 01; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitro study. Chandra PV, Harikumar V, Ramkiran D, Krishna MJ, Gouda MV. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan 01; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23579893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements. Al-Saleh M, El-Mowafy O, Tam L, Fenton A. Oper Dent; 2010 Jan 01; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations. Araujo Fde O, Vieira LC, Monteiro Junior S. Oper Dent; 2006 Jan 01; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Khoroushi M, Karvandi TM, Kamali B, Mazaheri H. Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Jan 01; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations. Toledano M, Perdigão J, Osorio R, Osorio E. Oper Dent; 2000 Jan 01; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations. Owens BM, Johnson WW. Oper Dent; 2006 Jan 01; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations. Arisu HD, Uçtasli MB, Eligüzeloglu E, Ozcan S, Omürlü H. Oper Dent; 2008 Jan 01; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations. Spahr A, Schön F, Haller B. Am J Dent; 2000 Oct 01; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study. Schuckar M, Geurtsen W. J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct 01; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of a self-adhesive class V composite on primary and permanent dentitions. Shafiei L, Mojiri P, Ghahraman Y, Rakhshan V. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May 01; 14(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 24171990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope. Heintze SD, Monreal D, Peschke A. J Adhes Dent; 2015 Apr 01; 17(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25893223 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]