These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

538 related items for PubMed ID: 25825096

  • 21. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
    Fourie J, Smit CF.
    SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC, Franke M, Maia HP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Influence of Cavity Margin Design and Restorative Material on Marginal Quality and Seal of Extended Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro.
    Soliman S, Preidl R, Karl S, Hofmann N, Krastl G, Klaiber B.
    J Adhes Dent; 2016 Jul; 18(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 26814320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Sealing effectiveness of etch-and-rinse vs self-etching adhesives after water aging: influence of acid etching and NaOCl dentin pretreatment.
    Monticelli F, Toledano M, Silva AS, Osorio E, Osorio R.
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Jun; 10(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18652266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM, Johnson WW.
    J Adhes Dent; 2005 Jun; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems.
    Bedran de Castro AK, Pimenta LA, Amaral CM, Ambrosano GM.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002 Jun; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF, Jin YT, Tsai PF, Wong TY.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE, Farrag NM.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010 Sep; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M, Hannig M.
    J Adhes Dent; 2000 Sep; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F, Kern M, Blunck U, Dörfer C, Drenck J, Paris S.
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effect of operator-specific handling on tooth-composite interface and microleakage formation.
    Schneider H, Busch I, Busch M, Jentsch H, Häfer M.
    Oper Dent; 2009 Oct; 34(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 19363976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
    Farmer SN, Ludlow SW, Donaldson ME, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A.
    Pediatr Dent; 2014 Oct; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems.
    Cenci MS, Lund RG, Pereira CL, de Carvalho RM, Demarco FF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16708725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
    Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Wernecke KD, Roulet JF.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Apr; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T, Ozer F, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N, Blatz MB.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Apr; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T, Abe T, Ito Y, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Watson TF, Foxton RM.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Apr; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS, Amm EW, Ghayad A.
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.