These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Clinical implications of subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions associated with microcalcification: a radiology-pathology correlation study. Sanders MA, Roland L, Sahoo S. Breast J; 2010; 16(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19929890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Solid breast mass characterisation: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification. Costantini M, Belli P, Ierardi C, Franceschini G, La Torre G, Bonomo L. Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):877-94. PubMed ID: 17885742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions? Hoorntje LE, Peeters PH, Mali WP, Borel Rinkes IH. Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions. Georgieva M, Prantl L, Utpatel K, Wiesinger I, Stroszczynski C, Jung F, Jung EM. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019 Jul; 71(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30584133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Imaging features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast. Park YM, Park JS, Jung HS, Yoon HK, Yang WT. J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 23325754 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]