These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

293 related items for PubMed ID: 25836006

  • 1. Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Chen M, Li ZM, Liu X, Cai B, Wang DW, Feng ZC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 25836006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC, Lai EH, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Kawaguchi M, Shibata M, Goto S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH, Yao CC, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Differences between sliding mechanics with implant anchorage and straight-pull headgear and intermaxillary elastics in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Koyama I, Iino S, Abe Y, Takano-Yamamoto T, Miyawaki S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 21059875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retraction of posterior teeth.
    Oh YH, Park HS, Kwon TG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 21457858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
    Kaya B, Arman A, Uçkan S, Yazici AC.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG, Gürsoy S, Dinçer M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA, Melkos AB, Athanasiou AE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, Patil S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
    Xu TM, Zhang X, Oh HS, Boyd RL, Korn EL, Baumrind S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of the intrusive effects of miniscrews and utility arches.
    Polat-Özsoy Ö, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Veziroğlu F, Çetinşahin A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):526-32. PubMed ID: 21457864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Chhibber A, Upadhyay M, Shetty VS, Mogra S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement for maximum anchorage in adolescents: A 3-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    Sandler J, Murray A, Thiruvenkatachari B, Gutierrez R, Speight P, O'Brien K.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24974994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.