These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

293 related items for PubMed ID: 25836006

  • 21. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B, Ammayappan P, Kandaswamy R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, Kim LH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A comparison of the effects of 2 mandibular anchorage systems used with a 3-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Okay C, Gülsen A, Keykubat A, Ucem TT, Yüksel S.
    World J Orthod; 2006 Oct; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 16779970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
    Pinzan-Vercelino CR, Janson G, Pinzan A, de Almeida RR, de Freitas MR, de Freitas KM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M, Cozzani M, Caprioglio A.
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage.
    Aslan BI, Kucukkaraca E, Turkoz C, Dincer M.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 23772682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Nonsurgical correction of a Class III malocclusion in an adult by miniscrew-assisted mandibular dentition distalization.
    Jing Y, Han X, Guo Y, Li J, Bai D.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):877-87. PubMed ID: 23726338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a new all-in-one appliance for rapid palatal expansion, early class III treatment and upper molar distalization.
    Wilmes B, Ludwig B, Katyal V, Nienkemper M, Rein A, Drescher D.
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S47-53. PubMed ID: 25138366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects.
    Mariani L, Maino G, Caprioglio A.
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Sep; 15(1):43. PubMed ID: 25138818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bondemark L, Karlsson I.
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Correction of severe bimaxillary protrusion with first premolar extractions and total arch distalization with palatal anchorage plates.
    Kook YA, Park JH, Bayome M, Sa'aed NL.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):310-20. PubMed ID: 26232840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
    Suzuki EY, Suzuki B.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013 Aug; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
    Strahm C, De Sousa AP, Grobéty D, Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction.
    Haydar S, Uner O.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10629519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes.
    Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19268827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Distalization of the maxillary and mandibular dentitions with miniscrew anchorage in a patient with moderate Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Chen G, Teng F, Xu TM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Mar; 149(3):401-10. PubMed ID: 26926028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
    Benson PE, Tinsley D, O'Dwyer JJ, Majumdar A, Doyle P, Sandler PJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A comparative analysis of maxillary tooth movement produced by cervical headgear and pend-x appliance.
    Taner TU, Yukay F, Pehlivanoglu M, Cakirer B.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 14719733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint.
    Scheffler NR, Proffit WR, Phillips C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 25439210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in hyperdivergent patients.
    Lineberger MW, McNamara JA, Baccetti T, Herberger T, Franchi L.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 22748991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.