These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
232 related items for PubMed ID: 25840373
1. Frequency-place map for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants: Change over time. Vermeire K, Landsberger DM, Van de Heyning PH, Voormolen M, Kleine Punte A, Schatzer R, Zierhofer C. Hear Res; 2015 Aug; 326():8-14. PubMed ID: 25840373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch. Schatzer R, Vermeire K, Visser D, Krenmayr A, Kals M, Voormolen M, Van de Heyning P, Zierhofer C. Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants. Landsberger DM, Svrakic M, Roland JT, Svirsky M. Ear Hear; 2015 Mar; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant. Peters JPM, Bennink E, van Zanten GA. Audiol Neurootol; 2019 Mar; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear. Dorman MF, Spahr T, Gifford R, Loiselle L, McKarns S, Holden T, Skinner M, Finley C. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 17351713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. Boëx C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kós MI, Pelizzone M. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. Reiss LA, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz BJ. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):241-57. PubMed ID: 17347777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users. Bernstein JGW, Jensen KK, Stakhovskaya OA, Noble JH, Hoa M, Kim HJ, Shih R, Kolberg E, Cleary M, Goupell MJ. J Neurosci; 2021 Dec 08; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation. Zeng FG, Tang Q, Lu T. PLoS One; 2014 Dec 08; 9(2):e88662. PubMed ID: 24551131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation. Reiss LA, Turner CW, Karsten SA, Gantz BJ. Neuroscience; 2014 Jan 03; 256():43-52. PubMed ID: 24157931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users. Kan A, Litovsky RY, Goupell MJ. Ear Hear; 2015 Jan 03; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant. Landsberger DM, Vermeire K, Claes A, Van Rompaey V, Van de Heyning P. Ear Hear; 2016 Jan 03; 37(3):e149-59. PubMed ID: 26583480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception. Reiss LA, Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb 03; 29(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 18025998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees. Vandali A, Sly D, Cowan R, van Hoesel R. Hear Res; 2013 Aug 03; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]