These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
697 related items for PubMed ID: 25858218
1. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study. Bayramoğlu E, Özkan YK, Yildiz C. J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses. Karl M, Graef F, Wichmann M, Krafft T. J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of different restorative and abutment materials on marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit cantilever implant-supported fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study. Kahramanoğlu E, Kulak-Özkan Y. J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):608-17. PubMed ID: 23725094 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. Yilmaz B, Alshahrani FA, Kale E, Johnston WM. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In Vitro Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of Press-on-Metal Ceramic (PoM) Restorations with Zirconium-Supported and Conventional Metal Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures Before and After Veneering. Varol S, Kulak-Özkan Y. J Prosthodont; 2015 Jul; 24(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 25274041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology. Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Zhang X. J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Vigolo P, Mutinelli S. J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles. Vigolo P, Fonzi F. J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. de França DG, Morais MH, das Neves FD, Barbosa GA. J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Att W, Komine F, Gerds T, Strub JR. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses. Lopez-Suarez C, Gonzalo E, Pelaez J, Serrano B, Suarez MJ. Int J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 27148985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Microfractures in metal-ceramic and all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses caused by superstructure fixation. Karl M, Graef F, Wichmann M, Beck N. Dent Mater J; 2012 Apr; 31(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 22673463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of repeated firings on marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different techniques. Önöral Ö, Ulusoy M, Seker E, Etikan İ. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 29627208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinical comparison of zirconia, metal and alumina fixed-prosthesis frameworks veneered with layered or pressed ceramic: a three-year report. Christensen RP, Ploeger BJ. J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Nov; 141(11):1317-29. PubMed ID: 21037189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks. Akçin ET, Güncü MB, Aktaş G, Aslan Y. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour. Larsson C. Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011 Nov; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]