These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

697 related items for PubMed ID: 25858218

  • 21. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M, Monaco EA, Kim HI, Davis EL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
    Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Borges J, Almeida R.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
    Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy.
    Kohorst P, Junghanns J, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):527-36. PubMed ID: 20495937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
    Tamac E, Toksavul S, Toman M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Marginal fit of 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: Influence of pattern fabrication method and repeated porcelain firings.
    Giti R, Farrahi P.
    PLoS One; 2024 Oct; 19(4):e0301799. PubMed ID: 38625846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Marginal and internal adaptation of different superstructure and abutment materials using two different implant systems for five-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study.
    Kahramanoğlu E, Kulak-Ozkan Y.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Oct; 28(5):1207-16. PubMed ID: 24066310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
    López-Suárez C, Castillo-Oyagüe R, Rodríguez-Alonso V, Lynch CD, Suárez-García MJ.
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B, Kale E, Johnston WM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs.
    Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 22(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 19639075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of CAD/CAM and Conventional Cement Retained Implant-Supported Single Crowns.
    Nejatidanesh F, Shakibamehr AH, Savabi O.
    Implant Dent; 2016 Feb; 25(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 26505132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
    Presotto AG, Bhering CL, Mesquita MF, Barão VA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
    Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schmitt J.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 19049530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems.
    Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Apr; 113(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 15819826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations.
    Holden JE, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Clark EA.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 19682215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Fatigue behavior of zirconia-ceramic, galvano-ceramic, and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures.
    Eroğlu Z, Gurbulak AG.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):516-522. PubMed ID: 23735078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R, Figueras-Álvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, Oliver-Parra R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Marginal and Internal Discrepancies of Posterior Zirconia-Based Crowns Fabricated with Three Different CAD/CAM Systems Versus Metal-Ceramic.
    Ortega R, Gonzalo E, Gomez-Polo M, Suárez MJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 28(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 26340011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features.
    Aktas G, Özcan N, Aydin DH, Şahin E, Akça K.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24360015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Effect of Thermomechanical and Static Loading on the Load to Fracture of Metal-Ceramic, Monolithic, and Veneered Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Lopez-Suarez C, Tobar C, Sola-Ruiz MF, Pelaez J, Suarez MJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 30548895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.