These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


247 related items for PubMed ID: 2588917

  • 1. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M.
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A, Cuzick J, Singer A.
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M, Fertitta L, Goldbaum B, Hamza M, Vanerian S, Isenstein L.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
    Hoffman MS, Gordy LW, Cavanagh D.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Aug; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B, Andersson A, Zetterberg C, Nordin B.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G, Schlaerth JB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK.
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE.
    Acta Cytol; 1986 Aug; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
    Marchand L, Mundt M, Klein G, Agarwal SC.
    WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.
    Neinstein LS, Church J, Akiyoshi T.
    J Adolesc Health; 1992 Sep; 13(6):520-3. PubMed ID: 1390820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.