These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

461 related items for PubMed ID: 25893223

  • 1. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope.
    Heintze SD, Monreal D, Peschke A.
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Apr; 17(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25893223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F, Kaisarly D, Bader D, El Gezawi M.
    Oper Dent; 2016 Apr; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N, Hunecke A.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Apr; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM, Kakaboura AI, Ardu S, Krejci I.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Apr; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H.
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ, Prieto LT, Araújo CT, Paulillo LA.
    Oper Dent; 2012 May; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effectiveness of an infiltrant on sealing of composite restoration margins with/without artificial caries.
    Tulunoglu O, Tulunoglu IF, Antonson SA, Campillo-Funollet M, Antonson D, Munoz-Viveros C.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov 01; 15(6):717-25. PubMed ID: 25825096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
    Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug 01; 16(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 21947906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.
    Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jassé FF, Bortolotto T, Krejci I.
    J Dent; 2014 May 01; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss ME.
    Oper Dent; 2002 May 01; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch?
    Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M.
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct 01; 10(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 19058678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Roulet J.
    J Dent; 2000 Aug 01; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial.
    Barabanti N, Gagliani M, Roulet JF, Testori T, Ozcan M, Cerutti A.
    J Dent; 2013 May 01; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF.
    J Dent; 1999 Feb 01; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS, Faria-e-Silva AL, Casselli H, Martins LR.
    Gen Dent; 2012 Feb 01; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites.
    Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA.
    J Dent; 2014 Apr 01; 42(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24480086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M, Hannig M.
    J Adhes Dent; 2000 Apr 01; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The competition between enamel and dentin adhesion within a cavity: an in vitro evaluation of class V restorations.
    Bortolotto T, Doudou W, Kunzelmann KH, Krejci I.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug 01; 16(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 22015462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of a two-step self-etching vs two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive and SEM margin analysis: four-year results.
    Boeckler A, Boeckler L, Eppendorf K, Schaller HG, Gernhardt CR.
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Dec 01; 14(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 22724115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A, Schön F, Haller B.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct 01; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.