These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1117 related items for PubMed ID: 25893354

  • 1. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH, Pöhlmann F, Finger T, Onken J, Franke J, Czabanka M, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul 01; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH, Pöhlmann F, Finger T, Franke J, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov 01; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of the sagittal spinal profile type on the long-term outcome of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis after microsurgical decompression.
    Früh A, Sargut TA, Prinz V, Hecht N, Franke J, Dinkelbach M, Pöhlmann F, Vajkoczy P, Bayerl S.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Sep 01; 41(3):353-359. PubMed ID: 38848599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T, Watanabe K, Fujita N, Iwanami A, Hosogane N, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct 01; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S, Toyoda H, Matsumoto T, Suzuki A, Terai H, Nakamura H.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul 01; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach.
    Papavero L, Thiel M, Fritzsche E, Kunze C, Westphal M, Kothe R.
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec 01; 65(6 Suppl):182-7; discussion187. PubMed ID: 19934993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
    Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, Wöhrle J, Schmiedek P.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug 01; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion.
    Fujii K, Kawamura N, Ikegami M, Niitsuma G, Kunogi J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May 15; 40(10):703-9. PubMed ID: 25394314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M, Nakao S, Fukui D, Kadosaka Y, Matsuoka T, Yamada H.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov 01; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
    Chang HS, Fujisawa N, Tsuchiya T, Oya S, Matsui T.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar 01; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
    Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S, Giannakopoulos A, Heikenfeld R, Kasch R, Merk H, Godolias G, Ruetten S.
    Pain Physician; 2015 Mar 01; 18(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 25675060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
    Kelleher MO, Timlin M, Persaud O, Rampersaud YR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep 01; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical Outcomes and Radiologic Changes After Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression by a Unilateral Approach in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.
    Jang JW, Park JH, Hyun SJ, Rhim SC.
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug 01; 29(7):268-71. PubMed ID: 23073148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
    Crawford CH, Glassman SD, Mummaneni PV, Knightly JJ, Asher AL.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov 01; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis including degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Sasai K, Umeda M, Maruyama T, Wakabayashi E, Iida H.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Dec 01; 9(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 19035747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The impact of pelvic balance, physical activity, and fear-avoidance on the outcome after decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis.
    Donnarumma P, Presaghi F, Tarantino R, Fragale M, Rullo M, Delfini R.
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb 01; 26(2):428-433. PubMed ID: 27272492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression?
    Morgalla MH, Noak N, Merkle M, Tatagiba MS.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar 01; 14(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 21235300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.