These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1305 related items for PubMed ID: 25896675

  • 1. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
    Marnitz S, Wlodarczyk W, Neumann O, Koehler C, Weihrauch M, Budach V, Cozzi L.
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr 17; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intensity modulated proton beam radiation for brachytherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma.
    Clivio A, Kluge A, Cozzi L, Köhler C, Neumann O, Vanetti E, Wlodarczyk W, Marnitz S.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec 01; 87(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 24119834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Helical tomotherapy versus conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary chemoradiation in cervical cancer patients: an intraindividual comparison.
    Marnitz S, Lukarski D, Köhler C, Wlodarczyk W, Ebert A, Budach V, Schneider A, Stromberger C.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct 01; 81(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 20864270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dosimetric comparison of combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy versus IMRT alone for pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies.
    Milby AB, Both S, Ingram M, Lin LL.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar 01; 82(3):e477-84. PubMed ID: 22177626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis.
    Widesott L, Pierelli A, Fiorino C, Lomax AJ, Amichetti M, Cozzarini C, Soukup M, Schneider R, Hug E, Di Muzio N, Calandrino R, Schwarz M.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug 01; 80(5):1589-600. PubMed ID: 21167651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Application value of reduced field intensity modulated radiation therapy for advanced cervical cancer].
    DU XL, Sheng XG, Wang C, Yu H, Song QQ, Pan CX.
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Dec 01; 35(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24506963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dosimetric considerations to determine the optimal technique for localized prostate cancer among external photon, proton, or carbon-ion therapy and high-dose-rate or low-dose-rate brachytherapy.
    Georg D, Hopfgartner J, Gòra J, Kuess P, Kragl G, Berger D, Hegazy N, Goldner G, Georg P.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar 01; 88(3):715-22. PubMed ID: 24521685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.
    Cozzi L, Dinshaw KA, Shrivastava SK, Mahantshetty U, Engineer R, Deshpande DD, Jamema SV, Vanetti E, Clivio A, Nicolini G, Fogliata A.
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov 01; 89(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18692929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Unilateral and bilateral neck SIB for head and neck cancer patients : Intensity-modulated proton therapy, tomotherapy, and RapidArc.
    Stromberger C, Cozzi L, Budach V, Fogliata A, Ghadjar P, Wlodarczyk W, Jamil B, Raguse JD, Böttcher A, Marnitz S.
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Apr 01; 192(4):232-9. PubMed ID: 26852243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression.
    van de Bunt L, van der Heide UA, Ketelaars M, de Kort GA, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan 01; 64(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 15978745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Intensity modulated proton and photon therapy for early prostate cancer with or without transperineal injection of a polyethylen glycol spacer: a treatment planning comparison study.
    Weber DC, Zilli T, Vallee JP, Rouzaud M, Miralbell R, Cozzi L.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov 01; 84(3):e311-8. PubMed ID: 22999271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Helical tomotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost after laparoscopic staging in patients with cervical cancer: analysis of feasibility and early toxicity.
    Marnitz S, Köhler C, Burova E, Wlodarczyk W, Jahn U, Grün A, Budach V, Stromberger C.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb 01; 82(2):e137-43. PubMed ID: 21600704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Dose-painting intensity-modulated proton therapy for intermediate- and high-risk meningioma.
    Madani I, Lomax AJ, Albertini F, Trnková P, Weber DC.
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Mar 30; 10():72. PubMed ID: 25890217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
    Tran A, Zhang J, Woods K, Yu V, Nguyen D, Gustafson G, Rosen L, Sheng K.
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan 11; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer.
    Celik E, Baus W, Baues C, Schröder W, Clivio A, Fogliata A, Scorsetti M, Marnitz S, Cozzi L.
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 May 24; 15(1):120. PubMed ID: 32448296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of early stage prostate cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
    Schwarz M, Pierelli A, Fiorino C, Fellin F, Cattaneo GM, Cozzarini C, Di Muzio N, Calandrino R, Widesott L.
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Jan 24; 98(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21176983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.
    Mell LK, Tiryaki H, Ahn KH, Mundt AJ, Roeske JC, Aydogan B.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug 01; 71(5):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18640499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Proton arc reduces range uncertainty effects and improves conformality compared with photon volumetric modulated arc therapy in stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
    Seco J, Gu G, Marcelos T, Kooy H, Willers H.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep 01; 87(1):188-94. PubMed ID: 23920395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
    Deng X, Han C, Chen S, Xie C, Yi J, Zhou Y, Zheng X, Deng Z, Jin X.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan 01; 18(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28291936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 66.