These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

523 related items for PubMed ID: 25909818

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Affinity-based screening techniques: their impact and benefit to increase the number of high quality leads.
    Bergsdorf C, Ottl J.
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2010 Nov; 5(11):1095-107. PubMed ID: 22827747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Novel trends in high-throughput screening.
    Mayr LM, Bojanic D.
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 9(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 19775937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Benefits of Strategic Small-Scale Targeted Screening.
    Sharlow ER.
    Assay Drug Dev Technol; 2016 Aug; 14(6):329-32. PubMed ID: 27341343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cheminformatics approaches to analyze diversity in compound screening libraries.
    Akella LB, DeCaprio D.
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2010 Jun; 14(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 20457001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biodiversity of small molecules--a new perspective in screening set selection.
    Petrone PM, Wassermann AM, Lounkine E, Kutchukian P, Simms B, Jenkins J, Selzer P, Glick M.
    Drug Discov Today; 2013 Jul; 18(13-14):674-80. PubMed ID: 23454345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Natural product libraries: assembly, maintenance, and screening.
    Butler MS, Fontaine F, Cooper MA.
    Planta Med; 2014 Sep; 80(14):1161-70. PubMed ID: 24310213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Screening Library Design.
    Ashenden SK.
    Methods Enzymol; 2018 Sep; 610():73-96. PubMed ID: 30390806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The European Lead Factory: An updated HTS compound library for innovative drug discovery.
    van Vlijmen H, Ortholand JY, Li VM, de Vlieger JSB.
    Drug Discov Today; 2021 Oct; 26(10):2406-2413. PubMed ID: 33892142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fragment screening using X-ray crystallography.
    Davies TG, Tickle IJ.
    Top Curr Chem; 2012 Oct; 317():33-59. PubMed ID: 21678136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hit finding: towards 'smarter' approaches.
    Langer T, Hoffmann R, Bryant S, Lesur B.
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 9(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 19576852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Combinatorial library design from reagent pharmacophore fingerprints.
    Chen H, Engkvist O, Blomberg N.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011 Oct; 685():135-52. PubMed ID: 20981522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computational Toxicology Methods in Chemical Library Design and High-Throughput Screening Hit Validation.
    Hevener KE.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018 Oct; 1800():275-285. PubMed ID: 29934898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.