These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
355 related items for PubMed ID: 25915752
1. Rats show molar sensitivity to different aspects of random-interval-with-linear-feedback-functions and random-ratio schedules. Reed P. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):432-43. PubMed ID: 25915752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Procedure for preventing response strain on random interval schedules with a linear feedback loop. Reed P. Learn Behav; 2016 Mar; 44(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26198776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Free-operant performance on variable interval schedules with a linear feedback loop: no evidence for molar sensitivities in rats. Reed P, Soh M, Hildebrandt T, DeJongh J, Shek WY. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Oct; 26(4):416-27. PubMed ID: 11056882 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human performance on random interval schedules. Reed P, Smale D, Owens D, Freegard G. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):309-321. PubMed ID: 29985046 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement. Reed P. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An experimental analysis of steady-state response rate components on variable ratio and variable interval schedules of reinforcement. Reed P. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20718555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors controlling the micro-structure of human free-operant behaviour: Bout-initiation and within-bout responses are effected by different aspects of the schedule. Chen X, Reed P. Behav Processes; 2020 Jun; 175():104106. PubMed ID: 32209336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate. Galbicka G, Platt JR. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Oct; 12(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 3772301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Response acquisition with intermittent immediate and delayed conditioned reinforcement. Bermúdez K, Bruner CA, Lattal KA. J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Mar; 99(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 23355101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference. Nevin JA, Randolph, Holland S, McLean AP. J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):43-74. PubMed ID: 11516115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Food Restriction Level and Reinforcement Schedule Differentially Influence Behavior during Acquisition and Devaluation Procedures in Mice. Chevée M, Kim CJ, Crow N, Follman EG, Leonard MZ, Calipari ES. eNeuro; 2023 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 37696663 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Johansen EB, Sagvolden T, Kvande G. Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul 01; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Goal-directed control on interval schedules does not depend on the action-outcome correlation. Garr E, Bushra B, Tu N, Delamater AR. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jan 01; 46(1):47-64. PubMed ID: 31621353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]