These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
751 related items for PubMed ID: 25929463
1. Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion. Yuan W, Zhu Y, Liu X, Zhu H, Zhou X, Zhou R, Cui C, Li J. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 134():17-23. PubMed ID: 25929463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty. Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M, Mochizuki M, Moriya H. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Updates on ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Surgical outcome of anterior decompression and fusion for the ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine : a comparison with laminoplasty]. Iwasaki M, Sakaura H, Fujimori T, Yoshikawa H, Okuda S. Clin Calcium; 2009 Oct; 19(10):1486-92. PubMed ID: 19794258 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion. Highsmith JM, Dhall SS, Haid RW, Rodts GE, Mummaneni PV. J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 21388285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up. Hyun SJ, Rhim SC, Roh SW, Kang SH, Riew KD. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May 15; 34(11):1134-9. PubMed ID: 19444059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum 5-year follow-up data. Hyun SJ, Riew KD, Rhim SC. Spine J; 2013 Apr 15; 13(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 23218824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Chen Y, Guo Y, Lu X, Chen D, Song D, Shi J, Yuan W. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Feb 15; 24(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 20924295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Laminoplasty outcomes: is there a difference between patients with degenerative stenosis and those with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament? Meyer SA, Wu JC, Mummaneni PV. Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Mar 15; 30(3):E9. PubMed ID: 21361755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of effectiveness between laminoplasty and laminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy]. Zhang H, Sun T, Lu S, Li Q, Yadav SK. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct 15; 26(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 23167101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is high T-1 slope a significant risk factor for developing interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty? A retrospective cohort study. Oichi T, Oshima Y, Oka H, Taniguchi Y, Chikuda H, Matsubayashi Y, Takeshita K, Tanaka S. J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec 15; 27(6):627-632. PubMed ID: 28937936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Progression of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament After Laminoplasty or Laminectomy With Posterior Fixation. Kang MS, Kim KH, Park JY, Kuh SU, Chin DK, Kim KS, Jin BH, Cho YE. Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Nov 15; 32(9):363-368. PubMed ID: 31569177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]