These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

378 related items for PubMed ID: 25930084

  • 1. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography: in vitro evaluation of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent for in vivo optimization.
    Back SJ, Edgar JC, Canning DA, Darge K.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Sep; 45(10):1496-505. PubMed ID: 25930084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A Low-Cost, Durable and Re-Usable Bladder Phantom: Teaching Intravesical Ultrasound Contrast Administration.
    Shellikeri S, Back SJ, Poznick L, Darge K.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1918-1926. PubMed ID: 29801978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) with the intravesical administration of the ultrasound contrast agent Optison™ for vesicoureteral reflux detection in children: a prospective clinical trial.
    Ntoulia A, Back SJ, Shellikeri S, Poznick L, Morgan T, Kerwood J, Christopher Edgar J, Bellah RD, Reid JR, Jaramillo D, Canning DA, Darge K.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Feb; 48(2):216-226. PubMed ID: 29181582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Potential causes of insufficient bladder contrast opacification and premature microbubble destruction during contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography in children.
    Ključevšek D, Pečanac O, Tomažič M, Glušič M.
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2019 Jan; 47(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 30393874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of contrast-enhanced ultrasound administration setups on microbubble enhancement: a focus on pediatric applications.
    Kramer MR, Bhagat N, Back SJ, Poznick L, Forsberg F, Darge K, Eisenbrey JR.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Jan; 48(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 28894889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Residual intravesical iodinated contrast: a potential cause of false-negative reflux study at contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography.
    Colleran GC, Paltiel HJ, Barnewolt CE, Chow JS.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Oct; 46(11):1614-7. PubMed ID: 27350376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional static (3D) and real-time (4D) contrast enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) versus voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in children with vesicoureteral reflux.
    Woźniak MM, Wieczorek AP, Pawelec A, Brodzisz A, Zajączkowska MM, Borzęcka H, Nachulewicz P.
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1238-45. PubMed ID: 26597418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Acoustic techniques for assessing the Optison destruction threshold.
    Porter TM, Smith DA, Holland CK.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2006 Dec; 25(12):1519-29. PubMed ID: 17121946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. On the usefulness of the mechanical index displayed on clinical ultrasound scanners for predicting contrast microbubble destruction.
    Forsberg F, Shi WT, Merritt CR, Dai Q, Solcova M, Goldberg BB.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Apr; 24(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 15784762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contrast-enhanced Voiding Urosonography for Vesicoureteral Reflux Diagnosis in Children.
    Duran C, Beltrán VP, González A, Gómez C, Riego JD.
    Radiographics; 2017 Oct; 37(6):1854-1869. PubMed ID: 29019761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Optison in percutaneous thermoablation of liver tumors].
    Jung EM, Clevert DA, Rupp N.
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1403-12. PubMed ID: 14556110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [In-vitro comparison of a 1st and a 2nd generation US contrast agent for reflux diagnosis].
    Robrecht J, Darge K.
    Rofo; 2007 Aug; 179(8):818-25. PubMed ID: 17638173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography phantom study: intravenous iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents may cause false-negative results in assessment of vesicoureteral reflux in children.
    Veldhoen S, Sauer A, Gassenmaier T, Petritsch B, Herz S, Blanke P, Derlin T, Bley TA, Wirth C.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jun; 45(6):862-71. PubMed ID: 25655368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Membrane damage thresholds for 1- to 10-MHz pulsed ultrasound exposure of phagocytic cells loaded with contrast agent gas bodies in vitro.
    Miller DL, Dou C.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 30(7):973-7. PubMed ID: 15313329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.