These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

512 related items for PubMed ID: 25932601

  • 1. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.
    Erbulut DU, Zafarparandeh I, Hassan CR, Lazoglu I, Ozer AF.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
    Lee CH, Kim YE, Lee HJ, Kim DG, Kim CH.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
    Hartmann F, Dietz SO, Kuhn S, Hely H, Rommens PM, Gercek E.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011 Dec; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB, Murovic JA, Cho BY, Lim TJ, Park J.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol.
    Goel VK, Grauer JN, Patel TCh, Biyani A, Sairyo K, Vishnubhotla S, Matyas A, Cowgill I, Shaw M, Long R, Dick D, Panjabi MM, Serhan H.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec 15; 30(24):2755-64. PubMed ID: 16371899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
    Chen CS, Huang CH, Shih SL.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr 09; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical Effect of L4 -L5 Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on the Lower Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study.
    Cai XY, Sun MS, Huang YP, Liu ZX, Liu CJ, Du CF, Yang Q.
    Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun 09; 12(3):917-930. PubMed ID: 32476282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical characteristics of a novel interspinous distraction fusion device in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a finite element analysis.
    Chen M, Deng J, Bao L, Jia P, Feng F, Shi G, Tang H, Chen H.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Dec 06; 24(1):944. PubMed ID: 38057738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study.
    Shen H, Fogel GR, Zhu J, Liao Z, Liu W.
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul 06; 127():e1112-e1119. PubMed ID: 30980982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
    Mageswaran P, Techy F, Colbrunn RW, Bonner TF, McLain RF.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep 06; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed interspinous process device conjunction with interbody cage based on a finite element model.
    Bae IS, Bak KH, Chun HJ, Ryu JI, Park SJ, Lee SJ.
    PLoS One; 2020 Sep 06; 15(12):e0243771. PubMed ID: 33306706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of follower load on the range of motion, facet joint force, and intradiscal pressure of the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Cai XY, YuChi CX, Du CF, Mo ZJ.
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Aug 06; 58(8):1695-1705. PubMed ID: 32462554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanical assessment of a novel L4/5 level interspinous implant using three dimensional finite element analysis.
    Song C, Li XF, Liu ZD, Zhong GB.
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014 Aug 06; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 24452948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN, Biyani A, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Sairyo K, Ivanov A, Ebraheim NA, Patel TCh, Goel VK.
    Spine J; 2006 Aug 06; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Does oblique lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease: A finite element analysis.
    Du CF, Cai XY, Gui W, Sun MS, Liu ZX, Liu CJ, Zhang CQ, Huang YP.
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jan 06; 128():104122. PubMed ID: 33248365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
    Dmitriev AE, Gill NW, Kuklo TR, Rosner MK.
    Spine J; 2008 Jan 06; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.