These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

280 related items for PubMed ID: 25936634

  • 1. A combination of topographic and pachymetric parameters in keratoconus diagnosis.
    Toprak I, Yaylalı V, Yildirim C.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 25936634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
    Kamiya K, Ishii R, Shimizu K, Igarashi A.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
    Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Hurmeric V, Orucoglu F, Kılıc I.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Predictive Analysis Between Topographic, Pachymetric and Wavefront Parameters in Keratoconus, Suspects and Normal Eyes: Creating Unified Equations to Evaluate Keratoconus.
    Prakash G, Suhail M, Srivastava D.
    Curr Eye Res; 2016 Mar; 41(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25803133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Visual, Topographic, and Pachymetric Effects of Pediatric Corneal Collagen Cross-linking.
    Toprak I, Yaylali V, Yildirim C.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2017 Mar 01; 54(2):84-89. PubMed ID: 27668869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Characteristics of corneal topography in parents of keratoconus patients].
    Li J, Jing LL, Du XL.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun 11; 56(6):456-464. PubMed ID: 32842328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
    Huseynli S, Salgado-Borges J, Alio JL.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep 11; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Keratoconus diagnosis with optical coherence tomography pachymetry mapping.
    Li Y, Meisler DM, Tang M, Lu AT, Thakrar V, Reiser BJ, Huang D.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec 11; 115(12):2159-66. PubMed ID: 18977536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mapping corneal thickness using dual-scheimpflug imaging at different stages of keratoconus.
    Demir S, Ortak H, Yeter V, Alim S, Sayn O, Taş U, Sönmez B.
    Cornea; 2013 Nov 11; 32(11):1470-4. PubMed ID: 24071809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of classifying keratoconus location based on keratometry or pachymetry on progression parameters.
    Bardan AS, Kubrak-Kisza M, Kisza KJ, Nanavaty MA.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 May 11; 103(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 31184397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
    Arbelaez MC, Versaci F, Vestri G, Barboni P, Savini G.
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov 11; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of machine learning-based algorithms using corneal asymmetry vs. single-metric parameters for keratoconus detection.
    Prakash G, Perera C, Jhanji V.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug 11; 261(8):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 37022493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
    Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Ambrósio R, Heidari HR, Maddah N, Danesh Z, Sabzi F.
    Cornea; 2018 Aug 11; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Keratoconus: The ABCD Grading System.
    Belin MW, Duncan JK.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2016 Jun 11; 233(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 26789119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam.
    Miháltz K, Kovács I, Takács A, Nagy ZZ.
    Cornea; 2009 Oct 11; 28(9):976-80. PubMed ID: 19724217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR, Galletti JD, Minguez N, Delrivo M, Fuentes Bonthoux F, Pförtner T, Galletti JG.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul 11; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective.
    Bühren J, Schäffeler T, Kohnen T.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb 11; 40(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 24360499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus.
    Kovács I, Miháltz K, Kránitz K, Juhász É, Takács Á, Dienes L, Gergely R, Nagy ZZ.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Feb 11; 42(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 27026453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis.
    Fukuda S, Beheregaray S, Hoshi S, Yamanari M, Lim Y, Hiraoka T, Yasuno Y, Oshika T.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec 11; 97(12):1554-9. PubMed ID: 24081501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Intereye asymmetry detected by Scheimpflug imaging in subjects with normal corneas and keratoconus.
    Henriquez MA, Izquierdo L, Mannis MJ.
    Cornea; 2013 Jun 11; 32(6):779-82. PubMed ID: 23263222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.