These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 25976088

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
    Leong UC, Schwarz DM, Henry KS, Carney LH.
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.
    Eddins AC, Eddins DA.
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 29135686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. IV. Models using interaural time, level, and envelope differences.
    Mao J, Carney LH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):824-37. PubMed ID: 25234891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kaplan H, Pickett JM.
    Ear Hear; 1981 Feb; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. III. Monaural and diotic detection and model results.
    Davidson SA, Gilkey RH, Colburn HS, Carney LH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2258-75. PubMed ID: 16642840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A, Kohlrausch A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Binaural Frequency Modulation Detection in School-Age Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Effects of Interaural Modulator Phase.
    Kane SG, Buss E, Grose JH.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Jun; 42(3):691-699. PubMed ID: 33306546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises.
    Davidson SA, Gilkey RH, Colburn HS, Carney LH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1906-25. PubMed ID: 19813804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA, Fortune TW.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Svec A, Dubno JR, Nelson PB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43. PubMed ID: 25786946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.