These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

396 related items for PubMed ID: 25976708

  • 21. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
    de Camargo LM, Chee WW, Donovan TE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
    Gerrow JD, Price RB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Al-Johani A, Clark RK, Juszczyk AS, Radford DR.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A, Dixit S, Hoshing C, Raikar SP.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov 01; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK, Friel T, Taylor PD.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar 01; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM, Milot P, Ducharme P, Rose L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr 01; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
    Blatz MB, Sadan A, Burgess JO, Mercante D, Hoist S.
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb 01; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Feb 01; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH, Mancl LA, Schwedhelm ER, Verhoef DR, Lepe X.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan 01; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY, Adib SM, Zebouni EA, Bechara BB, Rifai KT.
    Gen Dent; 2009 Jan 01; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS, Odén A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul 01; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.