These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
717 related items for PubMed ID: 25982519
1. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Yasa B, Arslan H, Yasa E, Akcay M, Hatirli H. Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study. Kalburge V, Yakub SS, Kalburge J, Hiremath H, Chandurkar A. Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays. Salaverry A, Borges GA, Mota EG, Burnett Júnior LH, Spohr AM. J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Sorrentino R, Salameh Z, Zarone F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 17432401 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with different strategies after mechanical cycling. Rosa R, Hwas A, Melo D, Valandro LF, Kaizer O. Gen Dent; 2012 Feb; 60(2):e62-8. PubMed ID: 22414519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of structurally compromised canals restored with different dowel methods. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S. J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 22339985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin. Mohammadi N, Kahnamoii MA, Yeganeh PK, Navimipour EJ. J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro fracture resistance of molar teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composite material. Fráter M, Forster A, Keresztúri M, Braunitzer G, Nagy K. J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 24859462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of restorative techniques on fracture load of endodontically treated premolars. Bianchi E Silva AA, Ghiggi PC, Mota EG, Borges GA, Burnett LH, Spohr AM. Stomatologija; 2013 Sep; 15(4):123-8. PubMed ID: 24589635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Composite Overlays with and without Glass-fiber Reinforcement. Monaco C, Arena A, Scotti R, Krejci I. J Adhes Dent; 2016 Sep; 18(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 27042706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations. Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH. J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Belli S, Erdemir A, Ozcopur M, Eskitascioglu G. Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. Belli S, Erdemir A, Yildirim C. Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]