These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 25983718

  • 1. Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses.
    Kozlik J, Neumann R, Lozo L.
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():563. PubMed ID: 25983718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Commentary: Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses.
    Eder AB, Rothermund K, Hommel B.
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():163. PubMed ID: 26925003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Being moved: valence activates approach-avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach-avoidance intentions.
    Krieglmeyer R, Deutsch R, De Houwer J, De Raedt R.
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 20424109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Too close for comfort: Stimulus valence moderates the influence of motivational orientation on distance perception.
    Krpan D, Schnall S.
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Dec; 107(6):978-93. PubMed ID: 25437132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mechanisms underlying effects of approach-avoidance training on stimulus evaluation.
    Van Dessel P, Eder AB, Hughes S.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1224-1241. PubMed ID: 29648864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions.
    Eder AB, Rothermund K.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 18473659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Support from a TMS/MEP study for a direct link between positive/negative stimuli and approach/avoidance tendencies.
    Fini C, Fischer M, Bardi L, Brass M, Moors A.
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Jun; 143():107496. PubMed ID: 32407905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Approach and Avoidance During Routine Behavior and During Surprise in a Non-evaluative Task: Surprise Matters and So Does the Valence of the Surprising Event.
    Schützwohl A.
    Front Psychol; 2018 Jun; 9():826. PubMed ID: 29962978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A meta-analysis of the facilitation of arm flexion and extension movements as a function of stimulus valence.
    Laham SM, Kashima Y, Dix J, Wheeler M.
    Cogn Emot; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1069-90. PubMed ID: 25345558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation-behavior link.
    Eder AB, Klauer KC.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):218-35. PubMed ID: 19397381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Connection between the evaluation of positive or negative valence and verbal responses to a lexical decision making task].
    Brouillet T, Syssau A.
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Dec; 59(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16459896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: the case of attitudes and evaluative space.
    Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL, Berntson GG.
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 1997 Dec; 1(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 15647126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems.
    Hietanen JK, Leppänen JM, Peltola MJ, Linna-Aho K, Ruuhiala HJ.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Dec; 46(9):2423-30. PubMed ID: 18402988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Action Interpretation Determines the Effects of Go/No-Go and Approach/Avoidance Actions on Stimulus Evaluation.
    Chen Z, Van Dessel P.
    Open Mind (Camb); 2024 Dec; 8():898-923. PubMed ID: 39077108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The relative difficulty of resolving motivational conflicts is affective context-dependent.
    Enisman M, Kleiman T.
    Emotion; 2024 Sep; 24(6):1358-1375. PubMed ID: 38497728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Smiling faces and cash bonuses: Exploring common affective coding across positive and negative emotional and motivational stimuli using fMRI.
    Park HRP, Kostandyan M, Boehler CN, Krebs RM.
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):550-563. PubMed ID: 29644568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Priming of conflicting motivational orientations in heavy drinkers: robust effects on self-report but not implicit measures.
    Di Lemma LC, Dickson JM, Jedras P, Roefs A, Field M.
    Front Psychol; 2015 Jun; 6():1465. PubMed ID: 26483724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluative stimulus (in)congruency impacts performance in an unrelated task: evidence for a resource-based account of evaluative priming.
    Gast A, Werner B, Heitmann C, Spruyt A, Rothermund K.
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 61(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 24149245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Approach, avoidance and weight-related testing: An investigation of frontal EEG asymmetry.
    Faries MD, Kephart W, Jones EJ.
    Psychol Health Med; 2015 Jun; 20(7):790-801. PubMed ID: 25220609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.