These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A comparison of speech intelligibility and subjective quality with hearing-aid processing in older adults with hearing loss. Arehart KH, Chon SH, Lundberg EMH, Harvey LO, Kates JM, Anderson MC, Rallapalli VH, Souza PE. Int J Audiol; 2022 Jan; 61(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 33913795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation. Reinhart PN, Souza PE. J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the limits of frequency lowering. Souza PE, Arehart KH, Kates JM, Croghan NB, Gehani N. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1349-63. PubMed ID: 23785188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality. Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC. Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Working memory and intelligibility of hearing-aid processed speech. Souza PE, Arehart KH, Shen J, Anderson M, Kates JM. Front Psychol; 2015 Jun; 6():526. PubMed ID: 25999874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: experts' opinions and naive normal-hearing listeners' performance. Hilkhuysen GL, Gaubitch N, Huckvale M. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):404-15. PubMed ID: 23090965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition. Rallapalli V, Ellis G, Souza P. Ear Hear; 2021 Apr; 42(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 33136708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids. Shehorn J, Marrone N, Muller T. Ear Hear; 2018 Apr; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners. Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings? Neher T, Grimm G, Hohmann V, Kollmeier B. Ear Hear; 2014 Jun; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity. Hunter CR, Humes LE. Ear Hear; 2014 Jun; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role? Neher T, Grimm G, Hohmann V. Ear Hear; 2014 Jun; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels. Kuk F, Lau CC, Korhonen P, Crose B. J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]