These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


677 related items for PubMed ID: 25989069

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
    Ma N, Morris S, Kitterick PT.
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
    Wolfe J, Neumann S, Schafer E, Marsh M, Wood M, Baker RS.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Dillon MT, Buss E, Pillsbury HC, Adunka OF, Buchman CA, Adunka MC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH, Donaldson GS, Kong YY.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Feb; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.
    Jin SH, Nie Y, Nelson P.
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 23800809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.
    Dillon MT, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Hopfinger J, O'Connell BP.
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jan; 42(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 33885267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K, Turner C, Oleson J, Zhang X, Gantz B, Froman R, Olszewski C.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The effect of fluctuating maskers on speech understanding of high-performing cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S, Polterauer D, Keller S, Hemmert W.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jun; 55(5):295-304. PubMed ID: 26865377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Won JH, Moon IJ, Jin S, Park H, Woo J, Cho YS, Chung WH, Hong SH.
    PLoS One; 2015 Jun; 10(10):e0140920. PubMed ID: 26485715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Helbig S, Baumann U.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 67():81-87. PubMed ID: 19955724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears.
    Fu QJ, Galvin JJ, Wang X.
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct 02; 7(1):12500. PubMed ID: 28970567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.