These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

874 related items for PubMed ID: 25990321

  • 21. The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.
    Lee J, Ali H, Ziaei A, Tobey EA, Hansen JHL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2788. PubMed ID: 28464686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. An acoustic analysis of the vowel space in young and old cochlear-implant speakers.
    Neumeyer V, Harrington J, Draxler C.
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Sep; 24(9):734-41. PubMed ID: 20645857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Vowel intelligibility in children with cochlear implants: An acoustic and articulatory study.
    Turgeon C, Trudeau-Fisette P, Fitzpatrick E, Ménard L.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():87-96. PubMed ID: 28964317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Phonological Development in a Bilingual Arabic-English-Speaking Child With Bilateral Cochlear Implants: A Longitudinal Case Study.
    Sabri M, Fabiano-Smith L.
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov 21; 27(4):1506-1522. PubMed ID: 30326047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Auditory Perception and Production of Speech Feature Contrasts by Pediatric Implant Users.
    Mahshie J, Core C, Larsen MD.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Nov 21; 36(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 26035142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M, Hanekom JJ.
    J Commun Disord; 2013 Nov 21; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS, Rogers CL, Cardenas ES, Russell BA, Hanna NH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct 21; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E, Svirsky MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb 21; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Hearing performance and voice acoustics of cochlear implanted children.
    Coelho AC, Brasolotto AG, Bevilacqua MC, Moret AL, Bahmad Júnior F.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Feb 21; 82(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 26710684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 44.