These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


248 related items for PubMed ID: 25996481

  • 21. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
    Bellini CM, Galbusera F, Ceroni RG, Raimondi MT.
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reinforcement of bone cement around prostheses by pre-coated wire coil: a finite element model study.
    Grosland N, Kim JK, Park JB.
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1995 Mar; 5(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 7773144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
    Gupta S, van der Helm FC, van Keulen F.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. In vitro fatigue failure of cemented acetabular replacements: a hip simulator study.
    Zant NP, Heaton-Adegbile P, Hussell JG, Tong J.
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021019. PubMed ID: 18412506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G, Duggineni R.
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006 Apr; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Tissue stresses and strain in trabeculae of a canine proximal femur can be quantified from computer reconstructions.
    Van Rietbergen B, Müller R, Ulrich D, Rüegsegger P, Huiskes R.
    J Biomech; 1999 Apr; 32(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 10213036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip-resurfacing prostheses.
    Udofia IJ, Jin ZM.
    J Biomech; 2003 Apr; 36(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 12600344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP, Thacker BH, Katoozian H, Davy DT.
    J Biomech; 2006 Apr; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The effect of acetabular cup size on the short-term stability of revision hip arthroplasty: a finite element investigation.
    Phillips AT, Pankaj, Usmani AS, Howie CR.
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004 Apr; 218(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 15376726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX, Luo YM, Yan SG, Wu HB.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep 17; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Use of a genetic algorithm for multiobjective design optimization of the femoral stem of a cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Ishida T, Nishimura I, Tanino H, Higa M, Ito H, Mitamura Y.
    Artif Organs; 2011 Apr 17; 35(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 21332564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Finite element simulation of early creep and wear in total hip arthroplasty.
    Bevill SL, Bevill GR, Penmetsa JR, Petrella AJ, Rullkoetter PJ.
    J Biomech; 2005 Dec 17; 38(12):2365-74. PubMed ID: 16214484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.