These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
204 related items for PubMed ID: 25998411
1. The Effect of Microphone Type on Acoustical Measures of Synthesized Vowels. Kisenwether JS, Sataloff RT. J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 25998411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization. Uloza V, Padervinskis E, Uloziene I, Saferis V, Verikas A. J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice. Oliveira G, Fava G, Baglione M, Pimpinella M. J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Acoustic Analyses of Voice in Nonoptimized Conditions. van der Woerd B, Wu M, Parsa V, Doyle PC, Fung K. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec 14; 63(12):3991-3999. PubMed ID: 33186510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research. Lebacq J, Schoentgen J, Cantarella G, Bruss FT, Manfredi C, DeJonckere P. J Voice; 2017 Sep 14; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research. Manfredi C, Lebacq J, Cantarella G, Schoentgen J, Orlandi S, Bandini A, DeJonckere PH. J Voice; 2017 Jan 14; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Plug-and-Play Microphones for Recording Speech and Voice with Smart Devices. Noffs G, Cobler-Lichter M, Perera T, Kolbe SC, Butzkueven H, Boonstra FMC, van der Walt A, Vogel AP. Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2024 Jan 14; 76(4):372-385. PubMed ID: 37972580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures. Jannetts S, Lowit A. J Voice; 2014 Nov 14; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation. Solomon NP, Awan SN, Helou LB, Stojadinovic A. J Voice; 2012 Nov 14; 26(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 23177742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise. Manfredi C, Giordano A, Schoentgen J, Fraj S, Bocchi L, Dejonckere P. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul 14; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task. Brockmann M, Drinnan MJ, Storck C, Carding PN. J Voice; 2011 Jan 14; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. Maryn Y, Corthals P, Van Cauwenberge P, Roy N, De Bodt M. J Voice; 2010 Sep 14; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]