These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
295 related items for PubMed ID: 26009268
21. Can experts in acetabular fracture care determine hip stability after posterior wall fractures using plain radiographs and computed tomography? Davis AT, Moed BR. J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Oct; 27(10):587-91. PubMed ID: 23287759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital anatomical measurements and crucial bending areas of the fixation route along the inferior border of the arcuate line for pelvic and acetabular fractures. Bi C, Ji X, Wang F, Wang D, Wang Q. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Mar 15; 17():125. PubMed ID: 26979756 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Interobserver reliability of the young-burgess and tile classification systems for fractures of the pelvic ring. Koo H, Leveridge M, Thompson C, Zdero R, Bhandari M, Kreder HJ, Stephen D, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH. J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul 15; 22(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 18594301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Computer-reconstructed radiographs are as good as plain radiographs for assessment of acetabular fractures. Borrelli J, Peelle M, McFarland E, Evanoff B, Ricci WM. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Sep 15; 37(9):455-9; discussion 460. PubMed ID: 18982180 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Multislice CT (MSCT) in the detection and classification of pelvic and acetabular fractures]. Wedegärtner U, Gatzka C, Rueger JM, Adam G. Rofo; 2003 Jan 15; 175(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 12525990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of articular fragment displacement in acetabular fractures: a comparison of computerized tomography and plain radiographs. Borrelli J, Goldfarb C, Catalano L, Evanoff BA. J Orthop Trauma; 2002 Aug 15; 16(7):449-56; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 12172273 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy in radiographic assessment of pelvic ring fracture deformity: analysis of current methods. Nystrom LM, McKinley TO, Marsh JL. J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Dec 15; 27(12):708-15. PubMed ID: 23681407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Significance of clinical examination, CT and MRI scan in the diagnosis of posterior pelvic ring fractures. Nüchtern JV, Hartel MJ, Henes FO, Groth M, Jauch SY, Haegele J, Briem D, Hoffmann M, Lehmann W, Rueger JM, Großterlinden LG. Injury; 2015 Feb 15; 46(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 25527459 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Displaced inferior ramus fractures as a marker of posterior pelvic injury. Courtney PM, Taylor R, Scolaro J, Donegan D, Mehta S. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jul 15; 134(7):935-9. PubMed ID: 24740699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Acetabular fractures: anatomic and clinical considerations. Lawrence DA, Menn K, Baumgaertner M, Haims AH. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep 15; 201(3):W425-36. PubMed ID: 23971473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Computed tomography of the bony pelvis: a protocol for multiplanar imaging. Part II: Trauma. Howie JL. J Can Assoc Radiol; 1985 Dec 15; 36(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 4086498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Fixation of acetabular fractures. a novel method of pre-operative Omega plate contouring]. Taller S, Srám J, Lukáš R, Endrych L, Džupa V. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014 Dec 15; 81(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 24945390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. True three dimensional stereographic display of 3D reconstructed CT scans of the pelvis and acetabulum. Gautsch TL, Johnson EE, Seeger LL. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Aug 15; (305):138-51. PubMed ID: 8050223 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The incidence and the risk factors of venous thromboembolism in Korean patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures. Kim JW, Oh CW, Oh JK, Baek SG, Lee BJ, Hong HP, Min WK. J Orthop Sci; 2014 May 15; 19(3):471-7. PubMed ID: 24627176 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]