These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
276 related items for PubMed ID: 26018223
21. A comparative study of frictional force in self-ligating brackets according to the bracket-archwire angulation, bracket material, and wire type. Lee SM, Hwang CJ. Korean J Orthod; 2015 Jan; 45(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 25667913 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davies EH. Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of chlorhexidine-containing prophylactic agent on the surface characterization and frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires: an in vitro study. Hosseinzadeh Nik T, Hooshmand T, Farazdaghi H, Mehrabi A, Razavi ES. Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov 20; 14(1):48. PubMed ID: 24325758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A new esthetic fiber-reinforced polymer composite resin archwire: a comparative atomic force microscope (AFM) and field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) study. Chng CK, Foong K, Gandedkar NH, Chan YH, Chew CL. Prog Orthod; 2014 May 30; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 24950433 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems. Budd S, Daskalogiannakis J, Tompson BD. Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec 30; 30(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 18974067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The comparison of frictional resistance in titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and stainless steel brackets using stainless steel and TMA archwires: An in vitro study. Khalid SA, Kumar V, Jayaram P. J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2012 Aug 30; 4(Suppl 2):S203-11. PubMed ID: 23066253 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA, Keilig L, Bourauel C. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb 30; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets. Cordasco G, Farronato G, Festa F, Nucera R, Parazzoli E, Grossi GB. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec 30; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance of Connecticut New Arch Wires, Stainless Steel and Titanium Molybdenum Alloy Archwires Against Different Brackets. Suryavanshi S, Lingareddy U, Ahmed N, Neelakantappa KK, Sidiqha N, Minz M. Cureus; 2019 Nov 12; 11(11):e6131. PubMed ID: 31886067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations. Kapur Wadhwa R, Kwon HK, Close JM. Aust Orthod J; 2004 May 12; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA, Keilig L, El-Bialy T, Reimann S, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr 12; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Different bracket-archwire combinations for simulated correction of two-dimensional tooth malalignment: Leveling outcomes and initial force systems. Holtmann S, Konermann A, Keilig L, Reimann S, Jäger A, Montasser M, El-Bialy T, Bourauel C. J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov 12; 75(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 25344125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets. Kannan MS, Murali RV, Kishorekumar S, Gnanashanmugam K, Jayanth V. J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2015 Apr 12; 7(Suppl 1):S116-20. PubMed ID: 26015687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Sliding resistance of rectangular vs. beveled archwires in two self-ligating brackets: a finite element study. Iriarte AJ, Ortiz S, Cubides-Flechas K, Olaya C, Jaimes-Monroy G. Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2018 Dec 12; 31(3):149-155. PubMed ID: 30829370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Self-ligation esthetic brackets with low frictional resistance. Voudouris JC, Schismenos C, Lackovic K, Kuftinec MM. Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan 12; 80(1):188-94. PubMed ID: 19852660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance. Khambay B, Millett D, McHugh S. Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun 12; 26(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15222719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires. Kahlon S, Rinchuse D, Robison JM, Close JM. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul 12; 138(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 20620835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance. Choi SH, Kang DY, Hwang CJ. Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan 12; 84(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 23767940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires. Downing A, McCabe J, Gordon P. Br J Orthod; 1994 Nov 12; 21(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 7857894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]