These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

189 related items for PubMed ID: 26075294

  • 1. Accidental Durotomy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Management.
    Klingler JH, Volz F, Krüger MT, Kogias E, Rölz R, Scholz C, Sircar R, Hubbe U.
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():532628. PubMed ID: 26075294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP, Smith ZA, Nixon AT, Lawton CD, Dahdaleh NS, Wong RH, Auffinger B, Lam S, Song JK, Liu JC, Koski TR, Fessler RG.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Incidental Durotomy Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed with the Modified Wiltse Approach.
    Sheinis D, Sheinis V, Benharroch D, Ohana N.
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 81(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 32588413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety.
    Selznick LA, Shamji MF, Isaacs RE.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 19412024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience.
    Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, Gerszten PC, Moossy JJ, Kanter AS, Spiro RM, Okonkwo DO.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 21999389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Unintended durotomy in lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: a 10-year systematic review of the literature.
    Ghobrial GM, Theofanis T, Darden BV, Arnold P, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E8. PubMed ID: 26424348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
    Lee WC, Park JY, Kim KH, Kuh SU, Chin DK, Kim KS, Cho YE.
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive spine surgery.
    Ruban D, O'Toole JE.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Oct; 31(4):E15. PubMed ID: 21961859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
    Patel AA, Zfass-Mendez M, Lebwohl NH, Wang MY, Green BA, Levi AD, Vanni S, Williams SK.
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015 Oct; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O, Carr K, Thompson P, Hoang K, Darlington T, Perez E, Fatemi P, Gottfried O, Cheng J, Isaacs RE.
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Complications Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Independent Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact.
    Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, Hrynewycz NM, Brundage TS, Singh K.
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):E236-E240. PubMed ID: 31913178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yee TJ, Terman SW, La Marca F, Park P.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1796-801. PubMed ID: 24880486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Minimally invasive dorsal decompression-stabilization surgery in patients with overweight and obesity].
    Byval'tsev VA, Kalinin AA.
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2018 Oct; 82(5):69-80. PubMed ID: 30412159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Zuckerman SL, Godil SS, Cheng JS, McGirt MJ.
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Oct; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion in patients older than 70 years of age: analysis of peri- and postoperative complications.
    Karikari IO, Grossi PM, Nimjee SM, Hardin C, Hodges TR, Hughes BD, Brown CR, Isaacs RE.
    Neurosurgery; 2011 Apr; 68(4):897-902; discussion 902. PubMed ID: 21221024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shen X, Zhang H, Gu X, Gu G, Zhou X, He S.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1612-6. PubMed ID: 24814852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Is Body Mass Index a Risk Factor for Revision Procedures After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Narain AS, Hijji FY, Bohl DD, Yom KH, Kudaravalli KT, Singh K.
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):E85-E91. PubMed ID: 28538081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.